Cancer is curable
The secrets of eternal neither you know nor I
And answers to the riddles neither you know nor I.
Behind the mystic veil goes on our debate.
Shall the veil fall, will remain neither you nor I.
Omar Khayyam
When 900 years ago Omar Khayyam wrote this quatrain, many mysteries of the world preoccupied thoughts of the wise men of that time. Much of what was considered a mystery at the time of Khayyam has been disclosed in the coming centuries, particularly in the 20th century. And yet, many of the things that Khayyam and the Persians long before him took for granted, tends to remain a mystery for most nations of the world often even till these days.
One of the most mysterious phenomena for humanity over the 15 thousand years of its existence on Earth is cancer. Although oncopathologies are the second cause of mortality among all other existing diseases after cardiovascular pathologies, but life of patients following a cancer diagnosis and the journey they must walk afterwards sharply differs that of the cardiovascular diseases.
Oncopathologies are classified both according to their cellular origin and the organs affected by tumors. However, classification of oncopathologies according to the forms and localization is of little significance as for the medical science, so, too, for the patients who are desperate for real and effective treatments. For this reason, we don’t see a point in delving into this topic and detailing it out.
For determining the causes of oncological diseases were made researches and studies more than in any other field of medicine. To this day, scientists are trying to find the etiological factor of cancerous tumors development. Everyone tried to solve the secret of this mysterious disease, many scientists have offered their take on its occurrence which has led to numerous "theories" regarding the origin of cancer.
All over the world unanimously accepted that the cause of oncopathologies lies in "uncontrolled proliferation of cells". The belief that the secret of these diseases is confined to the limits of only one cell has long been dominating amongst all other widespread "theories" in this area. According to the authors of the conventional "theory", under the influence of different factors, including ultraviolet, radioactive radiation, oncogenic agents, various chemicals, bacteria, viruses, and parasites, an ordinary cell changes its essence and turns into the cancerous, which starts to proliferate "uncontrollably" and "continuously", thus forming a malignant tumor.
One of the microscopic features of cancer cells is a small cytoplasm-to-nucleus ratio. In other words, they have a large nucleus and a little cytoplasm. In medicine, it is generally assumed that the larger the cell's nucleus, the more it possesses the ability to proliferation. What means "a cell with large nucleus", if to look at this phenomenon from another side?
Every cell, both as part of the macroorganism and as a single-cell creature, is capable of proliferation. No one, not any social laws, dogmas, or rules have the power to control the process of cell division. Being unicellular organisms, bacteria are constantly proliferating. The cells of the human body as the cells of any other biological living being are all capable of proliferation, without exceptions. No one is capable of managing this process.
Anyone, who has anything to do with the medical sciences, knows that any cell of the human body, will continuously and uncontrollably proliferate once introduced to a growth environment. Cells of the mucous membranes, especially digestive system are completely renewed over the course of several days. This means that billions of body cells are continuously and uncontrollably reproducing. If the gist of cancer was truly limited to the will of only a unique cell that suddenly acquires the ability to uncontrollable proliferation, our whole globe would have been covered with huge mountains of tumors made up of cancerous tissue long ago!!!
This leads to the first conclusion that oncopathologies are not limited just to the will of a single cell and thus, they are typical of multicellular organisms exclusively. Unicellular creatures cannot suffer from cancer in any way. Thus, judging from the fact that the notion of "malignant neoplasm" is really beyond the scope of a single cell, it is possible to draw the second conclusion stipulating that in the given pathological process exactly takes part the host of the macroorganism. There are several arguments that can prove this assertion:
1.After macroorganism’s death, the cancerous tumor disintegrates, whereas on the basis of the "theory" about their "independent and uncontrolled proliferation", if cancerous cells were indeed capable of independent reproduction they would be continuing their division even more intensively after the macroorganism’s death.
2.Bacteria as independent microorganisms are also capable of continuous and uncontrolled proliferation. However, unlike cancer cells, they can easily continue their life and reproduction even out of macroorganism’s body and even after its death. What is the difference between them, if cancer cells cannot even survive without the macroorganism, not to mention further multiplication by division? If the capacity of uncontrollable proliferation is the main and the only etiological factor of oncopathologies, why the bacteria do not become a source of forming of malignant tumors with the same success?!!
3.In addition to cancer cells, the process of radio- and chemotherapy destroys other cells of the body, such as blood cells. However, over time, blood cell population reaches its initial size through multiplication and the process of their division ceases, but cancer cells continue on their proliferation without cease. If no one has given the "stop" command and nobody and nothing manages this process, how is it that some cells stop their multiplication and other continue it on? This can lead us to one conclusion only: it is not the cell that makes the trouble, but the macroorganism itself has a mechanism that controls the proliferation process of all its cells.
4.One of the firm evidence of the fact that oncopathologies are not limited to the properties of only a single cell is the effectiveness of our treatment method which in any way does not affect on the structure of the cell itself, but instead the main direction of influence focuses mainly on the macroorganism.
If practically no favorable and radical changes in the pattern and dynamics of oncopathologies can be noted over the entire time that the conventional "theory" of cancer exists and functions, it means that it is time to question its validity.
What is cancer, after all?
Casting aside once again any gibberish mixed in with human greed, selfishness, profit motives and stupidity, it’s time to ask, what is cancer in fact?
Every cell, like any other biological unit, has the capacity to grow. This is its natural prerequisite. Every cell consists of an outer membrane filled with cytoplasm that stores a nucleus. A cell’s existence can be imagined only in an environment that can support the exchange of nutrients and removal of metabolism products. A cell’s existence outside of an exchange environment is unimaginable and impossible.
Every cell is nourished through its outer membrane. Every cell grows in size as a result of nutrition. Any surface, including surface of an external membrane of a cell increases in a square parity, and volume in the cubic. For instance, when a cell reaches three times of own size, its surface triples and its volume increases by ninefold. Ultimately, this process in the continuation necessarily reaches a point when the surface of the outer cell membrane that grows in squares fails to provide adequate nourishment for its volume that increases in cubes over the same time. As the result, the cell’s volume-to-surface ratio violates and the cell faces the dilemma: either the cell must die while continuing to grow or it will have to divide and thus, restore the natural ratio of these parameters to ensure its optimal nutrition. To regain a logical surface-to-volume ratio once again, the cell is forced to divide. This is a physiological need of every cell in any part of the organism. What happens if cells fail to undergo division upon reaching stage of proliferation? Due to lack of nutrients, biologically important organelles of these cells die out and once atrophied, the cells themselves reduce to fibrous tissue.
The method of cell division has long been discovered and described by scientists and given that it plays no role in the formulation of our problem, let’s accept it for what it is and abstain from penetrating into its depths for revealing shortcomings. Upon a need to do so, there will surely come a man to use his curiosity in this area.
.jpg)
Scientists claim that the process of cell division occurs through mitosis. This method produces two daughter cells. As a result of this process, the size of each of these cells undergoes a three-fold reduction in volume and two-fold reduction in surface thus, bringing the mother cell back to a logical physiological surface-to-volume ratio. Only in this case can the surface of a cell be able to provide the nutritional requirements of its volume. This process can be considered as completed if as the result of mitosis not only appear two full-fledged daughter cells, but also their complete separation from each other is carried out. After a while, each of them grows in size and the need for division repeats again. However, when cell’s living conditions are not assigned for its growth and thus, its proliferation, such a need may not arise.
With many years of research and studies, we concluded and proved in practice, that the function of cell division in the last phase of mitosis is carried out by several biological substances that must be constantly present in intercellular spaces, especially in the growth media that supports cellular reproduction. Their presence is required for the cells to undergo a complete separation from each other in the last stage of mitosis. It should be emphasized that these biological chemicals are brought into the intercellular space exclusively with the bloodstream via the cardiovascular system. This explains the fact why cancer more often occurs in advanced age and why every other cancer patient is over 60. As it is known, the phenomenon of aging itself is the result of a total hemocirculation reduction accompanied by a decrease in the number of passable blood vessels, which is inherent of the old age. As a result of the aging process, the blood circulation to organs responsible for the synthesis of the aforementioned biological substances becomes disturbed. On the one hand, the total level of these substances in the blood serum reduces, and on the other, because of hemocirculation insufficiency, their delivery to the intercellular space becomes complicated.
What will happen if intercellular space runs short of these biological substances?
The cell, whose surface membrane was formerly contacting intercellular space from all of its sides and thus, receiving therefrom nutrients and withdrawing products of its metabolism, splits into two. Growth had severely disrupted the surface-to-volume ratio of the mother cell that has now been forced to divide. The outer membrane of the cell, despite the fact that it contacted with the intercellular space from all of its sides and carried out all the vital processes of metabolism, could no longer continue to provide the further its adequate nutrition. Now, there were formed two cells that failed to separate due to the absence of necessary biological substances, remaining, thus, adhered to each other and in totality have a smaller outer membrane area. On the one hand, the two formed cells desperately need more nutrition; on the other hand, owing to the fact that they failed to separate from each other after their division, a part of their outer membrane being common between them, has no contact with the intercellular space and cannot participate in the process of these cell’s nutrient absorption. Since part of the newly formed cell membranes remains conjoint, their total resulting surface-to-volume ratio will be disturbed even greater, and the cells are stimulated to more intensive proliferation. The cells begin intense multiplication by division. Because they fail to separate and mature, their nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio remains small and their scarce cytoplasm makes their nucleus appear large. This gives rise to one of the morphological features of cancer cells, what histologists describe as polymorphic multinuclearity. In fact, the so-called cancer cells are no different from healthy cells. The given confusion arises simply from the fact that a large number of cells are simultaneously undergoing a cycle of mitosis drawing an impression of anomalous multinuclearity in histological sections at the instant of microscopy, reflecting a short interval of time of the nuclei-transforming that simultaneously occur in multitude cells at various stages of mitosis.
Since the newly proliferated cells, much like their previous counterparts, in the future will not be able to completely separate from each other and restore a logical surface-to-volume ratio in this manner, adhering to one another and cumulating, they form a malignant tumor. Hence, the conclusion: the greater the ability of the cells to proliferation, the more aggressive tumors they are capable to form.
As of now, this is the most scientific explanation of the oncopathologies occurrence mechanism.
Is cancer truly curable?
The new theory of cancer’s origin was first offered by me back in 1987 when I was still a student at the medical university. Eight years later, utilizing my own financial resources, I succeeded in conducting my first trial treatments of patients with malignant neoplasms, thus already in practice, proving the scientific viability of the proposed theory that not only explains the cause of cancer, but also offers the practical application of its achievements for final defeating the most mysterious disease that has taken a toll in human lives for over 15 thousand years. Based on the new theory, it is possible to eliminate cancer from human society once and for all. The central kernel of the given theory lies in discovering the composition of the biological substances that must be present in the intercellular space for complete separation of the daughter cells in the last phase of mitosis. I was able to identify the chemical structure of these substances in the course of my twenty-two-year continuous searches and researches. In the first stage of oncopathologies treatment by these substances, intensive proliferation of the tumor cells will stop. Next, detaching from each other, in groups and one by one, the adhered malignant cells will be separated from the bulk owing to what first of all occurs the elimination of metastatic foci, if any, and following a steady reduction in size, the cancerous tumor itself completely disappears. In the second stage of treatment, after partial or full eradication of cancerous tissues, conditions required for the organism’s independent synthesis of substances necessary for termination of the last phase of mitosis and their delivery to the intercellular spaces completely regenerate.
One of the barriers to any treatment is the difficulty of delivering therapeutic drugs to the destination, in this case, to the localization of cancerous tumors. The only means of delivering drugs through the body is the cardiovascular system, providing blood circulation of the tissues. Reduction of the blood supply for any reason, including chemo- and radiotherapy or aging of the body tissues stipulated by the constriction of tumor-tissue-supplying blood vessels can impede delivery of essential drugs to the malignant neoplasm that leads to a partial reduction of therapeutic effect.
Besides, malignant tumors cells that have been subjected to chemo- and radiotherapy, but have not been completely destroyed, become more resistant and expand with layers of fibrous tissue that facilitate them a stronger adhesiveness to the bulk of tumor. This is another factor that reduces the effectiveness of any treatment, including the method offered by us.
Based on our theoretical explanations of cancer causes, in order to prove the scientific character and the effectiveness of our method in practice, we conducted some trial treatments of oncopatients. Some of the most significant examples are presented below.
In summer 2000, patient Natasha P., age 12, was under treatment in the Kiev Regional Hospital’s Oncology Department with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the left tonsil in the fourth stage. Her lymph nodes, lungs, liver and brain were all affected by metastases. The patient was receiving surgical treatment and radiation therapy, but the tumor continued to grow. Due to lesions of the pharyngeal muscles and vocal cords, her speech and swallowing were severely disturbed. Food intake was possible only in liquid state through a narrowed pharyngeal lumen. After surgery, the malignancy expanded particularly vigorously over a short period of time. Deep in the neck muscles, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of the cervical spine revealed a huge tumor of 12×4 cm in size. If the growth of adenocarcinoma was to continue at the same pace, in no time, there would be a risk of asphyxia. Proceeding from the presence of pain in the lower jaw, it was possible to judge about the tumor penetration into the mandibular canal. Due to the ineffectiveness of hospital treatment, the patient was discharged home. This is when the child’s parents appealed to us for medical treatment.
After four days of treatment by our method, the growth of the tumor was stopped and moreover, the tumor itself noticeably reduced in size. The appetite of the child improved. She regained the ability to swallow medicine and eat solid food. With every other day, the malignant neoplasm decreased in size and by the twentieth day of treatment, the child’s pharynx completely cleared from the timorous tissue. In a month, all what was left of adenocarcinoma were the cicatricial changes, as evidenced filmed by a video camera materials, excerpts of which are provided below. Repeated MRI revealed a round dot deep in the neck muscles that corresponded to the consistency of a fibrous tissue in accordance with the Hounsfield scale.
After treatment, when the patient appeared in the hospital department with a completely cancer-free pharynx, her former treating physicians were truly shocked. No one in the department had expected to see her again and they continually repeated: "This is a miracle, what a miracle!" But, unfortunately, this was the threshold of their scientific potential and enthusiasm.
Dear reader,
Humanity would have never reached great achievements and discoveries in any field of science without fallacious theories of the past, negation of which necessarily grants birth to new theories. Millennia have passed and unfortunately, the many, who could at least have taken the first steps of rebutting the eternally dominant, but practically useless "theories" both to human science and medicine, stayed idle. In addition, many are still trying by all means to hinder the introduction of new theories, whatsoever, depriving them the right to live and thus, withholding millions of people from the right of life, especially, considering in nothing innocent children. The basic motives of occupiers of science’s empty arena hampering introduction of views that differ from long ago necrotized, rotten "theories" are narrow-minded ambitions to let no one get ahead for the sake of saving image and concealing stupidity of someone, and commercial, criminal greed of others. For all these reasons, over the course of the last twenty years since we proposed our theory, despite the huge number of lives already lost, the new views still fail to take root and find their place in human science even as millions of people simply continue to die.
It is now 900 years since the times of Khayyam. Yet another mysterious secret of the human body has been revealed at last. Soon, the time will come for other mysteries of mankind to be disclosed, one by one. Humanity will penetrate into knowledge that has been thus far considered inherent to gods alone.
Finally, since skeptics find it convenient to brand any new scientific discovery as "folk medicine" to refute it without going to further troubles, we want to emphasize that new theory and the treatment method derived from it have no relation to traditional medicine in any of its forms whatsoever and while they are significantly different from the treatment methods adapted in the current medicine, and are implemented solely within the scope of modern medicamentous medicine and all drugs administered are on the pharmacological market for over 40 years and are registered with heath ministries of virtually all countries around the world.
